![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Audi Forum | Active Topics | Gallery / Garage | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| 1998 - 2006 Audi TT (Audi TT Forum) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Full Member
|
Quote:
Why is that? Is it just a function of time, that the 225 has been out longer and the market has produced the goodies for it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
|
eh.. a little of both....
Reasons: 1) the 3.2 is available in 2 cars - R32 and TT. The 1.8t is available in SEVERAL more platforms making it more economical to make parts for it 2)the boost on the 1.8t is set very low stock. a simple ecu upgrade will give you +30-40 hp. a chip on a 3.2 will give you maybe 15hp. 3)the 3.2 TT is pretty new 4) I've read that the DSG transmission can only handle up to ~300hp w/o upgrades 5) no true manual = less enthusiasts buying them 6) the simple fact that turbo cars are easier to mod than normally aspirated ones 7) Price - the 3.2TT is almost an entire price bracket above the 225TT, making it more of a status item. Take the ~$5000us you saved on getting a 225TT and put it into the engine, and you'll have a much faster car than the 3.2TT *i'm not saying the 3.2TT isnt an awesome car, i'd take one in a second. If you're planning on keeping your TT stock, and don't want to mod it, the 3.2 is a great option.* |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Newbie
|
Quote:
Any decision you make i.e. 225 Turbo or the 3.2 is a good one. Best of luck. Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Full Member
|
I didnt get around to thanking you for that reply. Makes alot of sense. My normal sense of selection is based on aesthetics and got to say, my TT is a little bit of a sheep in wolfs clothing. I wouldnt mind upping the performance to match the looks. The K&N air filter is going in this weekend. Been driving now since Monday from the service center. Will be interesting to see if there is a notable difference, however small. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Newbie
|
I have a 3.2 and I love it. Not as tuneable but a great ride with a stiffer suspesion setup, BIG brakes and better looks. I much prefer it to my 2004 1.8t. I just got tired of riding the boost. High speed drives were great but in traffic it was a pain. Too weak down low.
The car feels great around town (and tight country roads), more useable low end grunt. The sound is glorious, especial when you get it wound up. A great angry bellow. The motor and tranny are a good match. I like the DSG but I wish it was fully manual like the UK unit. The DSG is not at all like a Tiptronic which feels loose because it is a standard automatic transmission. It IS a manaul tranny, you can feel the direct connection on deceleration just like a fully manual car. This transmission has recieved more rave reviews than any other system (similar technology in Bugatti etc). If you don't like this one, then you don't like the technology. There are very few good mods for the car. One of the best is the Haldex unit mod. It pushes more power to the rear wheels under more circumstances. The others are chips although the gains are not huge. I think the increase in revs might make it more fun though. The two stage exhaust seems to rob a bit of power too. There is a cheap and easy mod for that. Here are some good links: http://hitechgti.50megs.com/audi/DSG-FAQ.html http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=1292565 http://www.greedspeed.com/applications/200...erformance_Part http://www.eiptuning.com/eip/haldex_3rd_party_opinion.html This guy has an amazing car. Check it out. The DSG unit has a new TCM but it is coping with a crazy amount of power: http://forums.audiworld.com/tt/threads/401052.phtml |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|